• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
Sunday, June 26, 2022
The Millennial Source
TMS
Home WORLD

Disinformation in the social media age. What we can take away

byZachary Frye
April 6, 2020
in WORLD
Source: Bdnews24

Source: Bdnews24

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin



In the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, the issue of disinformation campaigns on social media emerged as a topic of media fascination and a subject of near-constant political arguments.

Donald Trump, one of the most contentious candidates in American political history, had just been elected president and rumors swirled that his campaign might have benefited from aid from Russia, an allegation that amounted to treason. 

In the months that followed, news also emerged that the Russian government was supporting, financially and otherwise, organizations that used the Internet and social media to increase polarization and fuel suspicion of American institutions in the run up to the election. 

A formal investigation into the actions of the Trump campaign started in 2017, culminating in a 2019 report by an investigative team led by former FBI Director Robert Mueller. 

In the report, investigators alleged that Russian disinformation tactics were systematic, with Moscow-backed actors using fake personal and organizational accounts on social media to spread incendiary messages. The main organization involved was “The Internet Research Agency,” a company in Russia with supposed ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

As for the actions of the Trump campaign, while several members were found guilty of financial crimes, witness tampering, illegal foreign lobbying and making false statements to Congress and the FBI, among others, no evidence was found that President Trump or his aides had coordinated with a foreign power. 

Untangling these two related, but separate findings from the report proved to be a daily struggle for news outlets. Many Americans had already made up their minds regarding Trump’s culpability – or lack thereof – on the issue of Russian interference before the findings were even released. 

Social media as a new frontier 

When social media first gained prominence over a decade ago, business leaders and political commentators alike touted its groundbreaking potential to reshape society and government for the better. 

As more people gained access to technology to communicate digitally, voices would be raised and democracy would be strengthened, or so the argument went.

As time wore on, the downsides of the technology also became evident, as examples of misuse and documentation of viral rumors and lies on social media platforms piled up. Some touted their belief that democracies would falter if citizens couldn’t keep track of honest information on which to base their decisions.

Other voices still claim that the potential harm or good that comes from social media, like most human systems, isn’t a foregone conclusion. While there is no denying social media’s power to foster change – one just has to look at the role it played in ousting dictators like former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak from power – outcomes regarding its potential and downsides can only be attributed to the way the human brain is wired.

It’s well known that people are prone to forming opinions that feed into their preexisting beliefs, that they have affinities for others who they perceive think similarly, and that they indulge in emotional displays, including feelings of resentment. While none of this is new, there are those who argue that the worst of social media may be a reflection of these tendencies on a larger scale.

Effects on the election

In regards to Russia’s use of social media, one big question remains – how much did Russian efforts affect the 2016 election? 

Source: RT

While some commentators suggest that Russian disinformation altered the course of the election, others say that its effects on 2016’s outcome was negligible given the sheer amount of information voters received during the campaign – factual or not. 

In 2017, the leaders of major social media companies were compelled to address Congress regarding their knowledge of the Russian disinformation that had been disseminated on their platforms. 

In a written statement, Facebook said that Russian-based operatives created some 80,000 posts on their network, calculating that 126 million users, or about 40% of the US population, may have seen them at some point over the two years that preceded the election. 

Colin Stretch, at the time Facebook’s general counsel, argued that this number reflected only a tiny fraction of content on Facebook, equal to about one in 23,000 posts.

Mueller’s investigators claimed that Russian actors spent $160,000 on Facebook ads promoting fake news during the 2016 campaign. By comparison, the Trump and Clinton campaigns alone spent a combined $81 million. 

Likewise, despite claiming that hackers affiliated with the Russian government made numerous attempts to penetrate US databases, Mueller’s investigation found no evidence that vote tallies were altered or that voter’s registration information was compromised. 

Looking ahead

According to officials in the US and abroad, Russian disinformation campaigns are still ongoing, with the European Union (EU) recently warning that Russian-based actors are using the global coronavirus pandemic to sow doubts about the way the West has responded to the virus.

The EU characterized the digital moves as a “significant disinformation campaign” led by pro-Russian media aimed to stoke “confusion, panic and fear” and “subvert European societies from within.” Strikingly similar language was used during US government hearings on the issue. 

While Putin and other Russian officials have consistently denied claims that they interfered in the 2016 election or are currently working to spread disinformation, the majority of experts seem to agree that Russian-based attempts to sow discord are a real and continuing concern. 



Still, that doesn’t mean that the hope of creating positive digital environments is lost, during election season or otherwise, according to the Brookings Institution, an American research group. 

A report written by political scientists from Harvard and Northeastern University, argues that while false information is especially dangerous because it has the potential to “be used to create scapegoats, to normalize prejudices, to harden us-versus-them mentalities and even, in extreme cases, to catalyze and justify violence,” the credibility of the publication in which information appears, the repetition of information and societal pressure also has an influence on the public’s perception of news material.

For this reason, for democratic societies to see the truth amidst a glut of fake information, not only does professional and legitimate journalism need to be supported, but consumers need to practice sound digital literacy. 

This means readers and viewers should learn to develop a keen eye towards discerning the quality of their sources of information, while being especially wary of getting all their news from only one source. 

To this end, a recent study from Stanford University’s Sam Wineburg and Sarah McGrew found that the best online news gathering techniques could be taken from professional fact checkers. 

“In contrast [to most readers], fact checkers read laterally, leaving a site after a quick scan and opening up new browser tabs in order to judge the credibility of the original site.”

Instead of being satisfied with the first thing they read, “their stance toward the unfamiliar was cautious: while things may be as they seem, in the words of [one participant in the study], ‘I always want to make sure.’”

[article_ad]

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters here! 

Sign up for daily news briefs from The Millennial Source here!

Related

Tags: Longer read
Share5TweetShare

Latest Posts

Passengers wait to be tested after they arrive at Toronto's Pearson airport after mandatory coronavirus disease (COVID-19) testing took effect for international arrivals in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada February 15, 2021. REUTERS/Carlos Osorio

With travel increasing alongside COVID-19 cases, should US airlines brace for a second hit?

July 25, 2021
Huarong is still in deep water. Does it have a way out?

Huarong is still in deep water. Does it have a way out?

June 30, 2021
What part does climate change play in record high temperatures across the world?

What part does climate change play in record high temperatures across the world?

June 30, 2021

Will Biden’s infrastructure package lead to higher inflation?

June 30, 2021

Now that Facebook is a US$1 trillion company, what’s next?

June 30, 2021

What have we learned about how COVID-19 started?

June 30, 2021

Tesla launches a Chinese recall – increasing its problems in the country

June 28, 2021

The path forward for Biden’s infrastructure plan, explained

June 28, 2021

What’s going on with Victoria’s Secret?

June 28, 2021

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TMS NEWSLETTER

By providing your email, you agree to our Privacy Policy

The Millennial Source Ltd. 2021

No Result
View All Result
  • Your daily briefing
  • About us
  • Explore
    • Startups
    • Climate change
    • Tech giants
    • Crypto
    • The future of work
    • Banking giants
    • Economy
  • Lifestyle
  • Human stories
  • TMS archives
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy & Terms

2022 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    string(24) "jsonld single post debug"
    The Millennial Source
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

    If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.