• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
Saturday, May 21, 2022
The Millennial Source
TMS
Home WORLD

Facebook’s antitrust lawsuits, explained

byMatthew Stafford
December 13, 2020
in WORLD
Facebook’s antitrust lawsuits, explained

Source: Eric Gaillard, Reuters

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin
There is growing support for antitrust action against big tech, with scrutiny set to continue even after the end of President Donald Trump’s administration.

In two recent lawsuits filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and more than 40 state attorneys general, social media giant Facebook, Inc. is facing the unthinkable – its break up. 

After a nearly two-year-long investigation, the FTC, alongside a separate suit from some 40-plus attorneys general from across the United States, has charged Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook with illegally using its “dominance and monopoly power to crush smaller rivals and snuff out competition.”

The move represents the latest and perhaps the most heavy-handed critique of American “big tech” in recent months. Google LLC is already facing a lawsuit from the US government focused on its alleged search engine monopoly, while the US Congress has charged big tech with creating monopolies more broadly. 

The recommendation to break up Facebook would be disastrous for the social media giant’s business and, rather than just imposing a simple fine, would serve to unwind the multibillion dollar acquisitions of rivals Instagram and WhatsApp. 

However, there is no guarantee that the suits will succeed. Antitrust actions against big tech face a number of hurdles, including, but not limited to, outdated laws, well-resourced defenses, and more. 

But one thing is for certain – there is growing support for antitrust action against big tech, with scrutiny set to continue even after the end of President Donald Trump’s administration.

The two lawsuits have already received bipartisan support, with Democrats and Republicans largely in agreement that big tech has broken the law, disagreeing only on potential remedies to this problem.

Facebook under fire

The lawsuits from the FTC and more than 40 US state attorneys general are the culmination of a nearly two-year-long investigation into Facebook’s past business acquisitions. 

46 states joined the lawsuit, with only South Dakota, South Carolina, Alabama and Georgia abstaining.

Though the two suits are separate, their findings came to similar conclusions. 

In particular, the two lawsuits charge that Facebook’s 2012 US$1 billion purchase of Instagram and its US$19 billion purchase of WhatsApp two years later removed potential rivals from the market, serving to solidify Facebook’s dominance in the social media market. 

New York state Attorney General Letitia James, leading the states’ investigation into Facebook, argued that “for nearly a decade, Facebook has used its dominance and monopoly power to crush smaller rivals and snuff out competition, all at the expense of everyday users.”

In its lawsuit, the FTC, the US government body that enforces antitrust law, argued that Facebook, in its acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp, had used its monopoly power “with the aim of suppressing, neutralizing and deterring serious competitive threats.”

Instagram and WhatsApp have grown in popularity since Facebook’s acquisition and become more closely integrated into Facebook’s overall platform. This arguably makes it harder for users use social media and while avoiding Facebook. 

As a result, the FTC has called for the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp to be unwound and made independent once again. Future acquisitions by Facebook would be placed under significantly more scrutiny.

This recommendation is essentially the harshest that can be made and represents a big move by government lawyers and regulators, which, even if they ultimately fail, nonetheless shows that “the United States has entered a much bolder new era of antitrust enforcement,” according to The Verge’s Casey Newton. 

That there is a bipartisan consensus on this issue also suggests a future of more stringent antitrust oversight. Republican Representative Ken Buck responded to the lawsuit by stating that “big tech’s reckoning has just begun,” while Democratic Representative David Cicilline concurred with the lawsuits’ findings, writing that Facebook “must be broken up.”

Facebook has crushed competition by breaking the law.

Big Tech’s reckoning has just begun. https://t.co/GzgSundlKz

— Congressman Ken Buck (@RepKenBuck) December 9, 2020

Facebook immediately hit back against the lawsuits, with the company’s vice president and general counsel, Jennifer Newstead, arguing in a blog post titled “Lawsuits Filed by the FTC and the State Attorneys General Are Revisionist History” that Facebook’s acquisitions provided better products for consumers and the FTC cannot retroactively disapprove of transactions it had already signed off on years previously. 

In challenging Facebook’s acquisitions of potential competitors, “this lawsuit risks sowing doubt and uncertainty about the US government’s own merger review process and whether acquiring businesses can actually rely on the outcomes of the legal process,” Newstead wrote. 

Implications

Facebook’s shares fell 2% after the announcement of the lawsuit, but a break up of its acquisitions would have a much more seismic impact on the social media giant’s business. 

For one, much of Facebook’s future growth is tied to Instagram and WhatsApp. 

For Facebook, Instagram represents an area of as-yet incomplete revenue growth. In 2019, Instagram delivered some US$20 billion in revenue for Facebook, which was about 29% of all of Facebook’s ad sales that year.

According to the research firm eMarketer, Instagram’s 2020 revenues are expected to reach some US$28.1 billion, about 37% of Facebook’s total ad revenue, as well as an annual sales gain of US$8.1 billion that would account for a huge share of Facebook’s overall revenue growth. 

Though it makes essentially no money for Facebook, WhatsApp is also central to Facebook’s plans of future revenue growth. Facebook plans to put WhatsApp front-and-center for its emerging e-commerce presence, connecting WhatsApp’s messaging features to businesses.

Both apps also solidify Facebook’s global presence and, in some markets, are actually more popular than Facebook’s main platform. In India, WhatsApp has some 100 million more users than Facebook while in Japan Instagram has some 70% more users than Facebook.

Losing these apps in a potential breakup would mean more difficult competition for Facebook in emerging markets around the world, impacting future revenue growth significantly. 

Before that eventuality can be realized, however, the lawsuits must overcome some significant obstacles. 

Prosecutors have to show that Facebook’s purchases of Instagram and WhatsApp were targeted to kill off competition and potential rivals. 

Then, owing to the text of America’s antitrust laws and the consumer welfare standard, prosecutors must also show that consumers and the social media market would have been better off without the acquisitions. 

Central to this series of lawsuits, prosecutors will have to show why the mergers and acquisitions were approved years ago and are only being challenged now. 

In its defense, Facebook will likely point to the growth of Instagram and WhatsApp achieved under Facebook’s ownership. It will also likely argue that under Facebook’s ownership, neither app has to worry about profitability and can instead focus solely on the consumer experience. 

Facebook will also point to the fact that the FTC signed off on the acquisitions at the time and that the company has already stated that “the government now wants a do-over with no regard for the impact that precedent would have on the broader business community.”

We're reviewing the complaints & will have more to say soon. Years after the FTC cleared our acquisitions, the government now wants a do-over with no regard for the impact that precedent would have on the broader business community or the people who choose our products every day.

— Facebook Newsroom (@fbnewsroom) December 9, 2020

But there are arguments in the prosecutors’ favor. Instagram founders Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger resigned from the company following Facebook’s acquisition, allegedly as a result of the increasingly tight integration that was sought by the parent company, to the detriment of Instagram’s independence. 

And as the FTC lawsuit argues, Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram deprived consumers of, among other things, “the presence of an additional locus of competitive decision-making and innovation” and “an alternative provider of personal social networking for users untethered from Facebook’s control.” 

In the WhatsApp acquisition, consumers also lost “a competing personal social networking provider,” with WhatsApp limited to “providing mobile messaging services” by Facebook, according to the FTC. 

It will likely be years before any resolution to the lawsuits is met. Nonetheless, as Diana Moss, president of the American Antitrust Institute, argues, winning the case against Facebook is “going to be a challenge because the standards of proof are formidable.” 

But for now, win or lose, the two lawsuits represent another round of pressure heaped on American big tech and a sign that greater antitrust scrutiny is here to stay.

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at tips@themilsource.com

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: BusinessLonger readNorth America
ShareTweetShare

Latest Posts

Google Russia

Google to declare bankruptcy in Russia

May 19, 2022
SEC Wall Street

The US SEC investigates Wall Street over use of unapproved messaging apps

May 19, 2022
India wheat

India is banning wheat exports – here’s why that might be a big problem

May 17, 2022

There is a “very, very high risk” of a US recession, says Goldman Sachs Chairman Lloyd Blankfein

May 17, 2022

After 30 years of business, McDonald’s leaves Russia for good

May 17, 2022

Here’s what you need to know about the new twists in the Musk-Twitter tale?

May 16, 2022

Xiaomi accuses Indian agency of threats of violence during questioning

May 9, 2022

Shareholders launch lawsuit against Netflix for allegedly withholding the bad side of business

May 5, 2022

US hikes rates by half-percentage point, rules out bigger future rate increases

May 5, 2022

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TMS NEWSLETTER

By providing your email, you agree to our Privacy Policy

The Millennial Source Ltd. 2021

No Result
View All Result
  • Your daily briefing
  • About us
  • Explore
    • Startups
    • Climate change
    • Tech giants
    • Crypto
    • The future of work
    • Banking giants
    • Economy
  • Lifestyle
  • TMS archives
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy & Terms

© 2022 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

string(24) "jsonld single post debug"
The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.