• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Write for us
No Result
View All Result
Wednesday, January 27, 2021
THE MILLENNIAL SOURCE
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter
TMS
No Result
View All Result
Home WORLD

The US government owns billions of dollars worth of property in Hong Kong. Will it be impacted by tensions with China?

byZachary Frye
July 22, 2020
in WORLD
Reading Time: 5 minute read
The US government owns billions of dollars worth of property in Hong Kong. Will it be impacted by tensions with China?

Source: Bloomberg

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin



According to reports, the United States government owns a portfolio of HK$41 billion (approximately US$5.2 billion) in Hong Kong property, including its Consulate-General office which alone is valued at HK$24.7 billion (approximately US$3.2 billion).

However, with the introduction of the city’s controversial National Security law earlier this month, which some Western governments around the world say is repressive, tensions between the US and China are on the rise. 

American businesses in Hong Kong are reacting to the situation with some level of concern. In a recent survey conducted by the American Chamber of Commerce, 76% of respondents (out of 183 companies in total) said they were “somewhat” or “extremely” concerned about the new legislation.

While 65% said the law would not impact their plans to stay in the city, a significant percentage of American businesses (35%) said they would consider relocating capital, assets or operations out of Hong Kong.

As for the property market, reports indicate that developers are trying to target Hong Kong investors who might wish to move assets abroad by increasing social media ads directed toward attracting foreign investments. 

Public polling data indicates that many Hong Hong residents are feeling uneasy about life in the city.

Polling from the Hong Kong Public Opinion Institute, an independent agency, noted in February that just under 70% of Hong Kongers said they were not confident in Hong Kong’s future. In a separate poll released earlier this month but taken before the security law was announced, about half of respondents said they would consider leaving the city. 

For US property specifically, which consists not just of government buildings but also villas and luxury flats, growing tensions and unease about the viability of these assets over the long term could induce pressure to sell.

Still in the game

A State Department email in late May revealed that the US government has already decided to sell property in Hong Kong worth some US$1.8 billion earlier this year.

In the email obtained by Bloomberg, a State Department representative said that the agency “regularly reviews the US Government’s overseas real estate holdings as part of its global reinvestment programme.”

They noted, however, that the US government was also funneling money into maintaining and enhancing other properties in the city, suggesting that there were no plans to totally abandon its property assets in Hong Kong.

Could China put pressure on US assets?

Although billions of dollars worth of US property remains firmly planted in the city, uncertainty and tensions between the US and China have increased substantially over the past several months.

While there are no immediate indications that US property could be in legal jeopardy in Hong Kong, high-profile disagreements between the two powers could impact American dealings in the city more generally. 

There are already reports that Hong Kong officials with assets on American soil are being affected. Earlier this week the Trump administration signed a bill to impose sanctions on individuals responsible for drafting and implementing the new security law. 

For at least two Hong Kong officials with property in the US, Bernard Chan and Laura Cha, reports indicate that under the sanctions regime they are barred from “investing, transferring, exporting, withdrawing or dealing with any property or interests in property in the US.”

While most of the sanctioned individuals report having no properties in the US, one Hong Kong government official, Regina Ip, argued that the language in the bill was very broad and could have a range of impacts on those individuals and their families.

“Surely there would be a chilling effect, as some officials may have sent their children to the US for study, or would like to travel to visit relatives,” she said

According to Carrie Lam, Hong Kong’s chief executive, the sanctions regime will not impact her personally. “I have no assets in the US, and I don’t particularly like going to the US. If they won’t grant me a visa, then I will just not go there,” she said after the bill was announced. 

Although the Chinese government recently announced its own sanctions regime against several US officials amid disagreements over alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang, the move was largely symbolic as none of the individuals, including Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, have any financial assets or liabilities in China. 

With tensions on the rise and China showing a willingness to react to US pressure in kind, US businesses, assets and property in Chinese territory, including Hong Kong, could potentially face growing pressure.

In a press conference on July 15, China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying made it clear that Beijing intends to continue pushing back against the United States.

“The US attempt to obstruct the implementation of the national security law in Hong Kong will never succeed,” she said, adding that “If the US side insists on going in the wrong direction, China will respond resolutely.”

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at [email protected]

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: AsiaLonger readNorth America
ShareTweetShare

Latest Posts

Where will high profile Republicans go after Trump?

Where will high profile Republicans go after Trump?

January 27, 2021
Biden's executive order on ethics commitments, explained

Biden’s executive order on ethics commitments, explained

January 27, 2021
Tech companies and news publishers are waiting to see how Google’s fight with Australia pans out

Tech companies and news publishers are waiting to see how Google’s fight with Australia pans out

January 26, 2021

There are hundreds of white nationalist groups in the United States

January 26, 2021

Senator Bernie Sanders is the new chair of the Senate Budget Committee. What does that mean for US economic policy?

January 25, 2021

Who was – and wasn’t – on Trump’s pardon list?

January 25, 2021

What’s next for Donald Trump?

January 25, 2021

Beijing prepares for US-China reset under Biden

January 24, 2021

How the restart of federal executions led to calls to abolish the death penalty

January 24, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Write for us

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.