• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, March 7, 2021
THE MILLENNIAL SOURCE
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter
TMS
No Result
View All Result
Home WORLD

Is Trump supporters’ reluctance to speak to pollsters skewing poll numbers for the second time?

byZachary Frye
August 31, 2020
in WORLD
Reading Time: 5 minute read
Is Trump supporters’ reluctance to speak to pollsters skewing poll numbers for the second time?

Source: JASON REDMOND/AFP/Getty Images

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin



According to a new report from CloudResearch, a research company run by a team of academics, a significant number of voters who support Trump could be keeping their opinions to themselves when approached by pollsters.

Per their data, 11.7% of Republicans say they would not report their true feelings for their preferred candidate if asked. By contrast, just 5.4% of Democrats say the same thing, suggesting Trump supporters could be underrepresented in polling data. 

The latest national polling averages from FiveThirtyEight show that Joe Biden is retaining his substantial lead over Trump, leading by an average of 8.8 percentage points on August 29.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly called polls that show him to be trailing fake. He’s also suggested that polls could be underrepresenting his support, even as reports indicate that in private Trump admits that things aren’t looking good. 

As for Democrats, while some strategists are concerned that the polling numbers could lead to a false sense of security within the party and among voters, others say that there are significant differences between this year’s election and 2016 – a year in which Hillary Clinton’s substantial lead of six to seven percentage points in mid-October proved to matter little on Election Day. 

One of the biggest differences could be that Biden is significantly less unpopular nationally than Clinton was. According to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released in July, just 33% of the country views Biden in “very negative” terms. 

The same poll in 2016 found that in July of that year, 43% of Americans looked at Clinton as “very negative.”

Poll background 

CloudResearch suggests that one of the main drawbacks of political polls as they are normally run is that there is little empirical evidence of whether the received data reflects the actual feelings of voters.

While a margin of error of two to three percentage points usually accompanies poll numbers to make it clear that sampling errors could be skewing overall sentiment, CloudReserach is concerned about whether a larger number of people could be altering true voter sentiment with their reluctance to be truthful or forthcoming in their answers. 

To help tease out how many people could be giving untruthful answers in polls, instead of simply asking respondents if they lied, they first asked respondents how comfortable they would be in giving their true opinion to pollsters before asking who they supported.

“Our rationale for this approach was that there’s a major difference between admitting you just lied and admitting to being genuinely concerned about disclosing your preferred candidate,” they wrote in their findings.

Interestingly, in addition to the higher number of Republicans who said they would be reluctant to admit support for their preferred presidential candidate, a significant portion also said they would deliberately lie to pollsters if given the chance. 

According to their data, 10.1% of surveyed Trump voters said they were likely to be untruthful on phone surveys. For Biden supporters, that number was just 5.1%. 

A repeat of 2016?

Following Clinton’s surprise loss in the 2016 election, there was a lot of hand wringing from Democrats as to what went wrong and how to prevent it from happening again. One of the areas given a hard look was that of polling numbers.

In several important swing states leading up to the election, such as Wisconsin and Michigan, Clinton was leading by a substantial margin, with some polls giving her a 6.5% to 8% lead in Wisconsin and nearly a 4-point lead in Michigan.

In Ohio, similarly, Clinton was polling ahead of Trump by several percentage points going into the election. Trump ended up winning Wisconsin and Michigan by less than one percentage point and took Ohio by over 8%, giving him a boost in electoral votes that helped catapult him to the presidency. 

Although polling institutions like Pew Research are adamant that polls are largely correct representations of overall support at that particular time, they admit that there were methodological errors with some polls in 2016 – especially with local-level data that skewed its polling toward college-educated voters who were more likely to favor Clinton.

For Michael Moore, the prominent liberal filmmaker who warned of Trump’s strong level of support in the rural Midwest in the lead-up to the 2016 election, Democrats should not be totally confident that Trump is sure to lose this year. 

In a recent Facebook post, Moore asked his followers whether the country was ready for another surprise victory and urged fellow liberals to get out the vote if they were intent on pushing Trump out of office. 

“I’m warning you almost 10 weeks in advance. The enthusiasm level for the 60 million in Trump’s base is OFF THE CHARTS! For Joe, not so much,” he wrote, adding that he was posting to “provide the reality check again.”

While Moore did refer to polling that shows Trump narrowing the gap in some swing states, critics say that Trump still has an uphill battle against his Democratic challenger, especially due to the fact that many now take him seriously as a candidate. 

“No one is underestimating Trump’s chances as some did in 2016,” wrote NPR’s senior political correspondent Domenico Montanaro. “Democrats see him far more as a clear, present and urgent threat who very well could win reelection,” he added.

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at [email protected]

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: Longer readNorth AmericaPolitics
Share4TweetShare

Latest Posts

Will the US or China control the future?

Will the US or China control the future?

March 7, 2021
After raising US$8.3 billion in loans, what’s Tencent going to do next?

After raising US$8.3 billion in loans, what’s Tencent going to do next?

March 4, 2021
How would Senator Elizabeth Warren’s 2% wealth tax work?

How would Senator Elizabeth Warren’s 2% wealth tax work?

March 4, 2021

The future of cryptocurrency

March 3, 2021

After an ascendant 2020, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is having a terrible 2021

March 3, 2021

The Biden administration’s changes to the Paycheck Protection Program

March 2, 2021

What are NFTs?

March 2, 2021

The Dasgupta Review offers economically viable solutions for combating climate change

March 2, 2021

Here are the biggest take-aways from CPAC 2021

March 1, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.