• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
No Result
View All Result
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
THE MILLENNIAL SOURCE
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter
TMS
No Result
View All Result
Home WORLD

The impact of the US Supreme Court’s rulings on the presidential election, explained

byChris Woods
November 2, 2020
in WORLD
Reading Time: 5 minute read
The impact of the US Supreme Court’s rulings on the presidential election, explained

Source: Andrew Kelly, Reuters

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin
With delays in mail delivery and an excess of absentee ballots, Democrats have tried to extend deadlines for counting mail-in ballots, with Republicans challenging these last-minute changes.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led a record number of Americans to cast their votes in the 2020 general election via absentee ballots. With delays in mail delivery and an excess of absentee ballots an ongoing concern, Democrats have tried to extend deadlines for counting mail-in ballots, with Republicans challenging these last-minute changes. Many of these cases have reached the United States Supreme Court, where rulings have varied.

Politicization of mail-in ballots

Since the start of the campaign, the Trump administration has repeatedly claimed that mail-in voting increases voter fraud. In June, the president tweeted that “Mail-In Ballots will lead to a RIGGED ELECTION!” And, in a press conference in September, Trump said that “When the ballots and when the system is rigged – which it is, obviously it is – and the only one that knows that better than me are the Democrats.” 

Barr: Mail-in Ballots ‘Absolutely Opens the Floodgates to Fraud‘ https://t.co/vd4AD3EPb0 via @BreitbartNews. This will be the Election disaster of our time. Mail-In Ballots will lead to a RIGGED ELECTION!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 22, 2020

Right wing media sources have consistently reported instances of voter fraud, reporting ballot dumping and harvesting. However, most of these reports have been debunked. Attorney General William Barr has even described mail-in ballots as suspect, telling The New York Times Magazine that “We’ve been talking about how, in terms of foreign influence, there are a number of foreign countries that could easily make counterfeit ballots, put names on them, send them in. And it’d be very hard to sort out what’s happening.”

Justin Levitt, law professor at Loyola Law, disputed Barr’s claim, telling FactCheck.org that “Mail-in ballots are printed on special paper, with specific bar coding unique to each election office and special US Mail election insignia.” Levitt added that if foreign entities created a passing counterfeit ballot, scanners would reject them. In addition, most states require signature-checks, matching signatures on file with the ones on the ballots.

Issues with absentee ballots are rare and there has been no evidence to suggest significant cases of voter fraud. 

Kate Shaw, law professor at Cardozo Law School, told ABC News that “There is no evidence that widespread or systematic absentee voter fraud is a real phenomenon. There have been scattered instances of both in-person and absentee voter fraud throughout history. But that’s something that both Democratic and Republican campaigns have engaged in.” 

Despite claims from Republicans that mail-in voting favors Democrats, a Stanford study shows that mail-in ballots favor neither party. Additionally, the introduction of mail-in ballots moderately increases voter turnout. However, these statistics can drastically change, as mail-in voting numbers have already shattered previous records due to coronavirus fears.

Critics of the Trump campaign’s tactics believe the voter-fraud claims are used to confuse voters to the point that the entire election is questioned. 

Myrna Pérez, Director of Brennan Center’s Voting Rights and Elections Program, believes the claims are intentionally confusing because they “discredit an election before it has occurred.” 

Supreme Court rulings

Since mail-in votes have been coming in at a record speed, Republicans have been challenging efforts to extend mail-in voting times, claiming changes so close to an election endanger the integrity of the results. The Supreme Court has weighed in on several cases in swing states, ruling both in favor and against these efforts in various states.

In Pennsylvania and North Carolina, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Democrats, allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to nine days after Election Day, rather than the typical three-day grace period. Three Republican appointees, Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Neil M. Gorsuch, ruled against the decision. Recent appointee Amy Coney Barrett had not been confirmed in time to weigh in on either case.

However, in a similar case in Wisconsin, the Supreme Court overturned the longer grace period, in a 5-3 ruling along ideological lines.

Explaining why the decision conflicted with prior rulings, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that despite the detailed effort by Wisconsin’s District Court, “it nonetheless contravened this Court’s longstanding precedents by usurping the proper role of the state legislature and rewriting state election laws in the period close to an election.” The conservative justices generally believe that federal courts should defer to the states, which is why the decisions seem to be conflicting.

In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote, “On the scales of both constitutional justice and electoral accuracy, protecting the right to vote in a health crisis outweighs conforming to a deadline created in safer days.”

Implications for the election

It is no coincidence that these court cases have taken place in swing states. Democrats worry that these rulings can have huge implications on the election, taking away key votes for former Vice President Joe Biden. 

Looking back to Wisconsin’s April primary, where the mail-in extension was granted, Kagan added, “Because of the court’s ruling, state officials counted 80,000 ballots—about five percent of the total cast—that were postmarked by Election Day but would have been discarded for arriving a few days later.” In an election as tight as this one, especially in swing states, 5% is a huge number.

In a statement mirroring many Republican talking points, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, “Last-minute changes by largely unaccountable bodies … invite confusion, risk altering election outcomes, and in the process threaten voter confidence in the results.”

It is hard to say exactly what impact absentee ballots will have on the election. For now, many political analysts are expecting a chaotic week after Election Day.

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at [email protected]

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: Longer readNorth AmericaPolitics
ShareTweetShare

Latest Posts

The Dasgupta Review offers economically viable solutions for combating climate change

The Dasgupta Review offers economically viable solutions for combating climate change

March 2, 2021
Here are the biggest take-aways from CPAC 2021

Here are the biggest take-aways from CPAC 2021

March 1, 2021
LinkedIn is launching its own service for freelancers

LinkedIn is launching its own service for freelancers

March 1, 2021

The House passed a COVID relief bill. What’s in it?

February 28, 2021

The Dasgupta Review urges us to rethink the economics of climate change and nature

February 28, 2021

China’s Lunar New Year experiment with digital currency

February 28, 2021

Everything you need to know about cryptocurrency

February 25, 2021

Will Biden follow the Trump administration’s plan to withdraw troops from Afghanistan?

February 25, 2021

What are SPACs?

February 25, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.