• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
Saturday, May 21, 2022
The Millennial Source
TMS
Home WORLD

Amid Europe’s free speech debate, Twitter posts letter against EU rules policing online content

byJake Shropshire
December 14, 2020
in WORLD
Amid Europe's free speech debate, Twitter posts letter against EU rules policing online content

Source: Brendan McDermid, Reuters

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin
The letter came as a major contribution to the conversation being had throughout Europe over freedom of speech, something that has been spurred on by recent events in France, Norway and England.

In an open letter published last Wednesday, Twitter, Mozilla, Automattic and Vimeo called for European Union legislators to reconsider the way new proposed legislation will handle harmful and illegal information posted online.

The letter claimed that the Digital Services Act and the Democracy Action Plan would exacerbate the role of internet gatekeepers without meaningfully dealing with some of the more constrictive issues facing the internet.

The companies spoke specifically against the way speech would be censored under the bill, advocating for “a content moderation discussion that emphasises the difference between illegal and harmful content and highlights the potential of interventions that address how content is surfaced and discovered.” They added, “Included in this is how consumers are offered real choice in the curation of their online environment.”

In the current draft of the legislation, illegal content and harmful content, as far as the companies controlling the content are concerned, are the same thing.

The letter came as a major contribution to the conversation being had throughout Europe over freedom of speech, something that has been spurred on by recent events in France, Norway and England.

France

In early October, Samuel Paty, a schoolteacher who showed his class a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad in a free speech lesson, was murdered by an Islamic extremist in a Parisian suburb, reigniting the country’s debate on free speech. Parents and teachers at the school said Paty gave students the opportunity to look away or leave the room when the photo was being shown.

The cartoon, published by the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, was also the root cause of the killing of 11 of the magazine’s staff members and of six other Parisians in 2015.

Debates ignited across the country following Paty’s murder, with demonstrations appearing in major cities like Paris, Lyon and Marseille in defiance of the attack.

“This tragedy affects each and every one of us,” said French Prime Minister Jean Castex, “because, through this teacher, it is the republic that was attacked.”

Later in November, the French parliament voted to approve a highly debated law that would ban the publication of images of on-duty police officers as well as expand the powers of police surveillance, kindling the flames of the free speech debate in the country.

The legislation would make it illegal for anyone to spread images that might harm the “integrity” of police officers, with up to a year in prison or a €45,000 for offenders.

Journalists’ groups, unions and human rights groups organized protests in most major French cities, arguing that the law would limit freedom of expression and could result in police brutality going unpunished. Some have gone so far as to call it a “freedom-killing law.”

Norway

In late November, Reuters reported that Norway’s parliament passed legislation that outlawed hate speech against transgender people, expanding a penal code that has protected gay and lesbian people since the 1980s.

Amendments also included changing the language of the original legislation from “homosexual orientation” to “sexual orientation” to include bisexual people.

“I’m very relieved actually, because (the lack of legal protection) has been an eyesore for trans people for many, many years,” said Birna Rorslett, the vice president of the Association of Transgender People in Norway.

Hate speech offenders face a fine or up to a year in jail for private comments and up to three years for public comments.

Opponents of the bill have argued that it goes too far, limiting any speech that would be considered critical of LGBT+ rights.

England

The BBC reported last week that a vote on free speech by Cambridge University in England rejected guidelines that would require opinions to be “respectful,” after critics argued that the proposed guidelines would limit freedom of expression.

The regulation would have, if passed, require that students, staff and visiting speakers be respectful of the views of others.

Concern quickly grew within the university about the implications of these rules, arguing that they could lead to censorship of valid, if controversial, opinions, which could remove the opportunity to question meritless claims.

The wording of the regulation was later changed to say that freedom of speech ensures the right to express “controversial or unpopular opinions within the law, without fear of intolerance or discrimination.”

The big debate

The European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees freedom of speech to all citizens of member countries of the EU, was only passed in 1950. Europe has also put some limitations on free speech in the past, with many countries making hate speech and speech intended to incite violence illegal. This is in large part a direct result of the propaganda used in the Second World War.

But the conversation goes beyond just the discussion of free speech rights to include an economic argument. This argument is also addressed in the letter published by the tech companies.

If “harmful-but-legal content” is required to be censored on all online platforms, the approach “would benefit only the very largest companies in our industry,” the statement reads.

The companies argue that the “one-size-fits-all” approach to content policy cannot possibly encapsulate the diversity that exists within different platforms, adding that it would ultimately have a “disproportionate – and potentially crippling – impact on smaller players” in the industry.

The letter finished with a call for the EU to “consider our collective views while developing these historic laws which will likely govern our online lives for a generation.”

“In sum, we ask the EU to defend the Open Internet.”

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at tips@themilsource.com

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: EuropeLonger readPolitics
ShareTweetShare

Latest Posts

Philippines

US, China, Russia congratulate Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. on Philippine election win

May 13, 2022
Hong Kong elections

Securing 1,416 votes, former security chief John Lee is now Hong Kong’s new leader

May 9, 2022
Philippine election

What you need to know about the Philippine presidential election right now

May 9, 2022

What is the US Supreme Court abortion law leak, and why does it matter?

May 4, 2022

What you need to know about Pelosi’s secret trip to Kyiv

May 2, 2022

Russia cuts Poland and Bulgaria’s gas supply over refusal to pay in rubles

April 27, 2022

Xi rejects Cold War mentality and pushes for global peace and cooperation

April 22, 2022

Russia ousted from UN Human Rights Council over war crimes in Ukraine

April 7, 2022

Everything you need to know about Trump’s legal troubles

January 30, 2022

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TMS NEWSLETTER

By providing your email, you agree to our Privacy Policy

The Millennial Source Ltd. 2021

No Result
View All Result
  • Your daily briefing
  • About us
  • Explore
    • Startups
    • Climate change
    • Tech giants
    • Crypto
    • The future of work
    • Banking giants
    • Economy
  • Lifestyle
  • TMS archives
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy & Terms

© 2022 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

string(24) "jsonld single post debug"
The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.