• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
Monday, May 23, 2022
The Millennial Source
TMS
Home WORLD

What would expanding the Supreme Court mean for the US?

byJoseph Lyttleton
April 18, 2021
in WORLD
What would expanding the Supreme Court mean for the US?

Source: James Lawler Duggan, Reuters

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin
Expanding the Supreme Court (or “court-packing” as it is sometimes called) has been floated as a possible means of rebalancing the Court following the confirmation of three conservative Justices during Trump’s single term.

On Thursday, April 15, Democratic members of Congress introduced a bill that would expand the United States Supreme Court from nine justices to 13. But with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi objecting to the bill and multiple other Democrats already having expressed their opposition to expanding the court, the bill appeared to be dead on arrival.

Nonetheless, the Judiciary Act of 2021, which is co-sponsored by Senator Ed Markey and Representative Jerrold Nadler, has its supporters in the Democratic Party. On April 9, President Joe Biden announced he was establishing a bipartisan panel to examine Supreme Court reform, including looking at “the membership and size of the Court.”

Many Democrats feel the Republicans stole a seat on the Supreme Court when then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to consider then-President Barack Obama’s nominee in 2016. Democrats’ anger only intensified when McConnell rushed the confirmation process for former-President Donald Trump’s third Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, weeks before the 2020 election.

Expanding the Supreme Court (or “court packing” as it is sometimes called) has been floated as a possible means of rebalancing the Court following the confirmation of three conservative Justices during Trump’s single term. It would allow Biden to nominate four liberal judges to the court, turning the now 6-3 conservative majority into a 7-6 liberal majority.

Republicans have opposed the expansion of the court, with Representative Ken Buck of Colorado calling the newly introduced bill a “full assault on the independence of the federal judiciary.” In 2019, Senator Marco Rubio and his Republican colleagues introduced a constitutional amendment to firmly set the Supreme Court at nine Justices. Rubio reintroduced the amendment this January.

Like the Judiciary Act of 2021, Rubio’s amendment is unlikely to get much traction, but it illuminates the partisan divide around the issue.

Republicans have called out Biden’s supposed hypocrisy on the issue of expanding the court, noting a Senate speech he gave in 1983 in which he called court packing “a bonehead idea.” Throughout his political career, Biden has repeatedly opposed an expansion of the Supreme Court, including during the 2020 campaign.

In the Senate, Joe Biden called court-packing a “bonehead idea” and “executive overreach”

During the campaign, he told us he was “not a fan”

Now, he just created a commission to study expanding the court

What changed Joe? pic.twitter.com/FdyFiYOFVD

— Benny (@bennyjohnson) April 9, 2021

The creation of the panel could indicate Biden’s views on the issue have evolved. But if that is the case, the Democrats’ narrow majority in the Senate means that the bill, even if it were to get a vote, would almost certainly not pass. Centrist Democrat Senator Joe Manchin has already said he opposes court packing, all but killing any hopes of the bill passing.

Like abolishing the filibuster, another dramatic change many Democrats support in hopes of passing a progressive policy agenda, court packing could backfire if and when the Republican Party takes back control of Congress.

The changing size of the Supreme Court

Another factor certainly being considered by Biden’s Supreme Court panel is the court’s history, which despite recent rhetoric, hasn’t always included nine Justices. In fact, the number of Justices on the Supreme Court has changed multiple times since the judicial body was created by the US Constitution.

When the Supreme Court first met in February 1790, there were only six Justices, all of them appointed by President George Washington. Originally, Supreme Court Justices also served as judges for federal circuit courts, of which there were 13 (for the 13 original states), split into three regions. Two Justices oversaw each region, limiting how much the Justices had to travel.

The second US president, John Adams, in an effort to stymie the man who beat him in the 1800 election, Thomas Jefferson, passed the Judiciary Act of 1801 just weeks before leaving office. That act reduced the number of Supreme Court Justices from six to five. However, when he took office, President Jefferson quickly repealed the act and it never had an effect on the size of the court.

As circuit courts expanded along with the size of the country, more Justices were added to the court and, by the time President Abraham Lincoln came along, there were nine Justices. However, following the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination, Congress voted to reduce the number of Justices to seven, at least in part to limit the power of Lincoln’s successor, President Andrew Johnson.

Johnson was regularly at odds with the Congress of his time and he was the first president to be impeached, though Congress ultimately didn’t remove him from office.

Johnson was succeeded in office by President Ulysses S. Grant, who was more popular with Congress. In 1869, Congress once again re-expanded the Supreme Court to nine Justices. It has remained at that number ever since.

Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “court-packing plan”

The last president to seriously consider expanding the Supreme Court was President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Having come into office in the midst of the Great Depression, FDR introduced a host of laws and policies known as the “New Deal,” which, in addition to attempting to reinvigorate the economy, was the most ambitious and progressive presidential agenda in history.

Having easily won reelection in 1936, FDR decided he would ride his popularity to address the biggest obstacle to his agenda: the Supreme Court. While Congress had supported the New Deal, the Supreme Court, made up of older, conservative Justices, had voted down some parts of FDR’s agenda, including vital pillars of the New Deal.

In 1937, FDR proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, which would have expanded the Supreme Court to 15 Justices and allowed the president to force sitting Justices to retire so he could replace them.

The bill was immediately opposed by Republicans (FDR was a Democrat), as well as many members of the president’s party. Labeled FDR’s “court-packing plan,” it was decried as executive overreach. When Congress eventually voted on it, it was struck down 70 to 22.

At the time, the plan was considered one of FDR’s biggest missteps, though it had little long-term effect. A couple of Justices had already changed their minds by the time the Senate voted on the bill and allowed key aspects of FDR’s agenda to stand, ensuring that the second phase of the New Deal could take effect.

Still, history has not been kind to FDR’s attempt to expand the Supreme Court. When Biden criticized court packing as a “bonehead idea,” he was specifically referencing Roosevelt’s ill-fated plan. In 2005, in another Senate speech, Biden said FDR had been “corrupted by power” and called the effort at court packing an “institutional power grab.”

Last week, President Biden announced his new committee to study increasing the size of the Supreme Court. Here’s Senator Biden in April 2005 decrying FDR’s court packing scheme in 1937 as a corrupt power grab: pic.twitter.com/zv1UxIuoCO

— Christian Schneider (@Schneider_CM) April 14, 2021

And yet, the similarities between Roosevelt and Biden’s current position are clear. Like FDR, Biden came into office in the midst of a crisis with an ambitious and far-reaching agenda (it has been called the “most progressive platform of any Democratic nominee in the modern history of the party”), with a Supreme Court whose ideological leaning puts it at odds with the president.

Even if Biden successfully gets his agenda through Congress with razor thin Democratic control, legal challenges to the laws would likely end up before the Supreme Court. At that point, it would benefit Biden to have more liberal Justices on the court. That could be enough of an argument to convince Biden that court packing has its advantages.

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at tips@themilsource.com

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: Longer readNorth AmericaPolitics
ShareTweetShare

Latest Posts

Biden North Korea

US President Joe Biden says he’s prepared for possible North Korea nuclear test during Asia tour

May 23, 2022
Australia prime minister

Labor Party leader Anthony Albanese claims victory as Australia’s 31st prime minister, ending nearly a decade of conservative rule

May 23, 2022
SEC Wall Street

The US SEC investigates Wall Street over use of unapproved messaging apps

May 19, 2022

There is a “very, very high risk” of a US recession, says Goldman Sachs Chairman Lloyd Blankfein

May 17, 2022

US, China, Russia congratulate Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. on Philippine election win

May 13, 2022

Securing 1,416 votes, former security chief John Lee is now Hong Kong’s new leader

May 9, 2022

What you need to know about the Philippine presidential election right now

May 9, 2022

US hikes rates by half-percentage point, rules out bigger future rate increases

May 5, 2022

What is the US Supreme Court abortion law leak, and why does it matter?

May 4, 2022

SUBSCRIBE TO THE TMS NEWSLETTER

By providing your email, you agree to our Privacy Policy

The Millennial Source Ltd. 2021

No Result
View All Result
  • Your daily briefing
  • About us
  • Explore
    • Startups
    • Climate change
    • Tech giants
    • Crypto
    • The future of work
    • Banking giants
    • Economy
  • Lifestyle
  • TMS archives
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy & Terms

© 2022 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

string(24) "jsonld single post debug"
The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.