• About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, April 18, 2021
THE MILLENNIAL SOURCE
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter
TMS
No Result
View All Result
Home WORLD

Did concerns over the US debt lead to a smaller stimulus package?

byMatthew Staffordand Edited byBrendan Monroe
December 23, 2020
in WORLD
Reading Time: 6 mins read
Did concerns over the US debt lead to a smaller stimulus package?

Source: Ken Cedeno, Reuters

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin
The US$900 billion bipartisan bill is on the lower end of what has been more than half a year’s worth of proposals for further coronavirus stimulus and economic relief.

With agreement having been reached on the latest coronavirus relief bill on Capitol Hill, some lawmakers have begun to reignite old concerns over the United States national debt. 

Both as a result of the economic response to the coronavirus pandemic and the policies undertaken throughout Donald Trump’s presidency, US national debt has soared to record highs in 2020. 

The federal deficit for fiscal year 2020 (which ended in September) stands at some US$3.1 trillion, with the national debt at US$27.5 trillion overall. 

Now, with only a few weeks remaining until President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration in January 2021, some Republicans are publicly airing their concerns over the US national debt, with some arguing that this timing is no coincidence. 

Regardless, analysts have warned for months that concerns about the debt should be sidelined while the economy recovers from the coronavirus pandemic. 

But the bipartisan bill that passed on Monday, December 21, was vastly cut down from previous offerings, on both sides of the negotiating table. 

Various figures have been floated in the past, but the US$900 billion bipartisan bill is on the lower end of what has been more than half a year’s worth of proposals for further coronavirus stimulus and economic relief. 

Furthermore, it is likely that political concerns, not genuine concerns over US debt, was what ultimately got the bill across the finish line, raising questions as to why stimulus could not be agreed upon earlier, not just at the eleventh-hour. 

Debt concerns

Successors to March’s unanimously-agreed CARES Act failed to secure bipartisan agreement, meaning it has been more than half a year since the last coronavirus stimulus measure was passed by Congress.

In October, House Democrats passed a US$2.2 trillion stimulus plan, itself much-reduced from earlier packages, but the plan failed to secure the agreement of Republicans who continued to hold out for a smaller, less expensive plan. 

However, the latest proposed coronavirus relief package had no problem achieving bipartisan agreement. 

Developed by a group of eight lawmakers from both parties and both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the latest bill provides US$900 billion in relief for American citizens and the US economy.

The package contains enhanced unemployment benefits at US$300 per week for 11 weeks, food assistance and student loan forbearance, as well as funding for small businesses, schools, vaccine deployment and more. 

The package does not contain the US$1,200 stimulus checks that were paid directly to American citizens as a consequence of March’s CARES Act, but will likely contain one-time checks of around US$600 – half the original amount. 

Commenting on the package, Democratic Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin commented that “everybody has a strong appetite to pass this” and “go home.”

And with the deal having secured agreement, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced that “we can finally report what our nation has needed to hear for a very long time: more help is on the way.”

However, the bill still needs President Trump’s signature to take effect.

Political pressure

Some Republicans have become more vocal in their concerns of US debt, even as President Trump has overseen a record expansion in the US debt and deficit, not just as a result of coronavirus relief measures. 

Republican Senator for Florida Rick Scott stated during an appearance on Fox Business that the US is “at $27 trillion worth of debt” and “somebody has got to pay for that.”

GOP Sen. Rick Scott today on Fox Business: "We're at $27 trillion worth of debt. Somebody has got to pay for that. I mean, think of how much money this year we're going to lose at the federal level. It's going to be trillions of dollars."

— Ryan Struyk (@ryanstruyk) December 17, 2020

That these concerns are only arising now, weeks before President-elect Joe Biden, a Democrat, is set to take office, has led to claims that debt concerns, during an unprecedented economic crisis in the US, are nothing more than political posturing. 

As Dartmouth political science Professor Brendan Nyhan commented, these public debt concerns aired by Republicans show “it’s Democratic president o’clock.”

But analysts and experts have long called on lawmakers to sideline their concerns for America’s growing national debt and instead focus on securing a large and robust stimulus package for the economy. 

Outgoing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell previously told the National Association for Business Economics that too little stimulus “would lead to a weak recovery,” which would only damage the financial standing of households and businesses, “harming the productive capacity of the economy and holding back wage growth.”

In contrast, “the risks of overdoing” stimulus “seem, for now, to be smaller,” Powell argued. This remains especially so as the Labor Department reported an uptick in filings for unemployment benefits in early December, a sign that the economic recovery is continuing to slow down without stimulus. 

On the other hand, political concerns, especially among Republicans, regarding two upcoming Senate runoff elections in Georgia, upon which control of the Senate hinges, likely pushed Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to rush a stimulus deal through. 

Even though the latest deal lacks the liability protection for businesses that McConnell previously held as necessary for any agreement to occur with Democrats, Republicans have fallen in line to pass the stimulus before Congress heads into recess over the Christmas period. 

In a private call with Republican lawmakers, McConnell reportedly stated that Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue were “getting hammered” for the failure to secure more coronavirus stimulus, which could jeopardize Republican control of the Senate. 

Ultimately, the latest coronavirus stimulus package contributes significantly less to the US debt than past proposals and it is arguably needed more than ever, especially as signs show that the economic recovery in the US continues to slow.

But it is likely that debt concerns played little part in solidifying bipartisan agreement around a much-reduced stimulus package.

Instead, control of the Senate, Mitch McConnell’s priority above all else, has seemingly pushed Republicans into action, even as Republicans begin to sound the debt alarm before President-elect Biden’s inauguration.

Have a tip or story? Get in touch with our reporters at [email protected]

Like TMS? Subscribe to our free daily newsletter

Related

Tags: Longer readNorth AmericaPolitics
ShareTweetShare

Latest Posts

The executed Lai Xiaomin left China Huarong teetering on the brink. Will Beijing save it?

The executed Lai Xiaomin left China Huarong teetering on the brink. Will Beijing save it?

April 15, 2021
Despite the persecution of Uighurs in Xinjiang, Muslim majority countries are maintaining business ties with China

Despite the persecution of Uighurs in Xinjiang, Muslim majority countries are maintaining business ties with China

April 15, 2021
Foreign companies struggle to balance political influence and profits in China

Foreign companies struggle to balance political influence and profits in China

April 15, 2021

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms hasn’t had a director since 2015. Biden is looking to change that

April 15, 2021

Everything you should know about Representative Matt Gaetz’s sex trafficking scandal

April 14, 2021

With Amazon winning the union vote in Alabama, what’s next for workers’ rights in America?

April 14, 2021

Everything you need to know about the Daunte Wright shooting

April 14, 2021

China controls most of the world’s rare earths. How does this affect the future economy?

April 13, 2021

Study: The US is a breeding ground for a growing diversity of diseases

April 13, 2021
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Write for us
  • Contact
  • Terms of service

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • US
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Profiles
  • Lifestyle
    • Food & Travel
    • Tech & Money
    • Health
    • Entertainment
  • Newsletter

© 2020 The Millennial Source Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.

The Millennial Source
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.